zookeeper选举代码分析

本文将以zookeeper的3.4.6版本作为源码分析版本。主要的代码类包括QuorumPeerMain、QuorumPeer、FastLeaderElection、QuorumMaj等。

假设有a,b,c三个zookeeper服务,serverid分别是1、2、3:

1.先启动集群中的a服务,先投票自己a为leader,并将投票信息发送给自己;

QuorumPeerMain对象调用QuorumPeer线程的startLeaderElection方法,最终调用FastLeaderElection的lookForLeader方法

2.再启动集群中的b服务,先投票自己b为leader,并将投票信息发送给自己和a服务;

3.a收到b的投票信息,服务a通过对比算法,选择b为leader,并通知自己和服务b;

    protected boolean totalOrderPredicate(long newId, long newZxid, long newEpoch, long curId, long curZxid, long curEpoch) {
        LOG.debug("id: " + newId + ", proposed id: " + curId + ", zxid: 0x" +
                Long.toHexString(newZxid) + ", proposed zxid: 0x" + Long.toHexString(curZxid));
        if(self.getQuorumVerifier().getWeight(newId) == 0){
            return false;
        }

        /*
         * We return true if one of the following three cases hold:
         * 1- New epoch is higher
         * 2- New epoch is the same as current epoch, but new zxid is higher
         * 3- New epoch is the same as current epoch, new zxid is the same
         *  as current zxid, but server id is higher.
         */

        return ((newEpoch > curEpoch) ||
                ((newEpoch == curEpoch) &&
                ((newZxid > curZxid) || ((newZxid == curZxid) && (newId > curId)))));
    }

4.服务a通过验证算法,确认b为leader;

5.服务b收到a的通知信息,通过验证算法b确认自身为leader;

    protected boolean termPredicate(
            HashMap<Long, Vote> votes,
            Vote vote) {

        HashSet<Long> set = new HashSet<Long>();

        /*
         * First make the views consistent. Sometimes peers will have
         * different zxids for a server depending on timing.
         */
        for (Map.Entry<Long,Vote> entry : votes.entrySet()) {
            if (vote.equals(entry.getValue())){
                set.add(entry.getKey());
            }
        }

        return self.getQuorumVerifier().containsQuorum(set);
    }

public boolean containsQuorum(HashSet<Long> set){
        return (set.size() > half);
    }

6.服务c启动后,发现集群已经选出leader为服务b;

7.下面的代码是选举过程中最重要的代码:

    public Vote lookForLeader() throws InterruptedException {
        try {
            self.jmxLeaderElectionBean = new LeaderElectionBean();
            MBeanRegistry.getInstance().register(
                    self.jmxLeaderElectionBean, self.jmxLocalPeerBean);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            LOG.warn("Failed to register with JMX", e);
            self.jmxLeaderElectionBean = null;
        }
        if (self.start_fle == 0) {
           self.start_fle = System.currentTimeMillis();
        }
        try {
            HashMap<Long, Vote> recvset = new HashMap<Long, Vote>();

            HashMap<Long, Vote> outofelection = new HashMap<Long, Vote>();

            int notTimeout = finalizeWait;

            synchronized(this){
                logicalclock++;
                updateProposal(getInitId(), getInitLastLoggedZxid(), getPeerEpoch());
            }

            LOG.info("New election. My id =  " + self.getId() +
                    ", proposed zxid=0x" + Long.toHexString(proposedZxid));
            sendNotifications();

            /*
             * Loop in which we exchange notifications until we find a leader
             */

            while ((self.getPeerState() == ServerState.LOOKING) &&
                    (!stop)){
                /*
                 * Remove next notification from queue, times out after 2 times
                 * the termination time
                 */
                Notification n = recvqueue.poll(notTimeout,
                        TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);

                /*
                 * Sends more notifications if haven‘t received enough.
                 * Otherwise processes new notification.
                 */
                if(n == null){
                    if(manager.haveDelivered()){
                        sendNotifications();
                    } else {
                        manager.connectAll();
                    }

                    /*
                     * Exponential backoff
                     */
                    int tmpTimeOut = notTimeout*2;
                    notTimeout = (tmpTimeOut < maxNotificationInterval?
                            tmpTimeOut : maxNotificationInterval);
                    LOG.info("Notification time out: " + notTimeout);
                }
                else if(self.getVotingView().containsKey(n.sid)) {
                    /*
                     * Only proceed if the vote comes from a replica in the
                     * voting view.
                     */
                    switch (n.state) {
                    case LOOKING:
                        System.out.println("receive message : electionEpoch,logicalclock"+n.electionEpoch+":"+logicalclock);
                        // If notification > current, replace and send messages out
                        if (n.electionEpoch > logicalclock) {
                            logicalclock = n.electionEpoch;
                            recvset.clear();
                            if(totalOrderPredicate(n.leader, n.zxid, n.peerEpoch,
                                    getInitId(), getInitLastLoggedZxid(), getPeerEpoch())) {
                                updateProposal(n.leader, n.zxid, n.peerEpoch);
                            } else {
                                updateProposal(getInitId(),
                                        getInitLastLoggedZxid(),
                                        getPeerEpoch());
                            }
                            sendNotifications();
                        } else if (n.electionEpoch < logicalclock) {
                            if(LOG.isDebugEnabled()){
                                LOG.debug("Notification election epoch is smaller than logicalclock. n.electionEpoch = 0x"
                                        + Long.toHexString(n.electionEpoch)
                                        + ", logicalclock=0x" + Long.toHexString(logicalclock));
                            }
                            break;
                        } else if (totalOrderPredicate(n.leader, n.zxid, n.peerEpoch,
                                proposedLeader, proposedZxid, proposedEpoch)) {
                            updateProposal(n.leader, n.zxid, n.peerEpoch);
                            sendNotifications();
                        }

                        if(LOG.isDebugEnabled()){
                            LOG.debug("Adding vote: from=" + n.sid +
                                    ", proposed leader=" + n.leader +
                                    ", proposed zxid=0x" + Long.toHexString(n.zxid) +
                                    ", proposed election epoch=0x" + Long.toHexString(n.electionEpoch));
                        }

                        recvset.put(n.sid, new Vote(n.leader, n.zxid, n.electionEpoch, n.peerEpoch));

                        if (termPredicate(recvset,
                                new Vote(proposedLeader, proposedZxid,
                                        logicalclock, proposedEpoch))) {

                            // Verify if there is any change in the proposed leader
                            while((n = recvqueue.poll(finalizeWait,
                                    TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)) != null){
                                if(totalOrderPredicate(n.leader, n.zxid, n.peerEpoch,
                                        proposedLeader, proposedZxid, proposedEpoch)){
                                    recvqueue.put(n);
                                    break;
                                }
                            }

                            /*
                             * This predicate is true once we don‘t read any new
                             * relevant message from the reception queue
                             */
                            if (n == null) {
                                self.setPeerState((proposedLeader == self.getId()) ?
                                        ServerState.LEADING: learningState());

                                Vote endVote = new Vote(proposedLeader,
                                                        proposedZxid,
                                                        logicalclock,
                                                        proposedEpoch);
                                leaveInstance(endVote);
                                return endVote;
                            }
                        }
                        break;
                    case OBSERVING:
                        LOG.debug("Notification from observer: " + n.sid);
                        break;
                    case FOLLOWING:
                    case LEADING:
                        /*
                         * Consider all notifications from the same epoch
                         * together.
                         */
                        if(n.electionEpoch == logicalclock){
                            recvset.put(n.sid, new Vote(n.leader,
                                                          n.zxid,
                                                          n.electionEpoch,
                                                          n.peerEpoch));

                            if(ooePredicate(recvset, outofelection, n)) {
                                self.setPeerState((n.leader == self.getId()) ?
                                        ServerState.LEADING: learningState());

                                Vote endVote = new Vote(n.leader,
                                        n.zxid,
                                        n.electionEpoch,
                                        n.peerEpoch);
                                leaveInstance(endVote);
                                return endVote;
                            }
                        }

                        /*
                         * Before joining an established ensemble, verify
                         * a majority is following the same leader.
                         */
                        outofelection.put(n.sid, new Vote(n.version,
                                                            n.leader,
                                                            n.zxid,
                                                            n.electionEpoch,
                                                            n.peerEpoch,
                                                            n.state));

                        if(ooePredicate(outofelection, outofelection, n)) {
                            synchronized(this){
                                logicalclock = n.electionEpoch;
                                self.setPeerState((n.leader == self.getId()) ?
                                        ServerState.LEADING: learningState());
                            }
                            Vote endVote = new Vote(n.leader,
                                                    n.zxid,
                                                    n.electionEpoch,
                                                    n.peerEpoch);
                            leaveInstance(endVote);
                            return endVote;
                        }
                        break;
                    default:
                        LOG.warn("Notification state unrecognized: {} (n.state), {} (n.sid)",
                                n.state, n.sid);
                        break;
                    }
                } else {
                    LOG.warn("Ignoring notification from non-cluster member " + n.sid);
                }
            }
            return null;
        } finally {
            try {
                if(self.jmxLeaderElectionBean != null){
                    MBeanRegistry.getInstance().unregister(
                            self.jmxLeaderElectionBean);
                }
            } catch (Exception e) {
                LOG.warn("Failed to unregister with JMX", e);
            }
            self.jmxLeaderElectionBean = null;
        }
    }

  

时间: 2024-10-10 13:29:48

zookeeper选举代码分析的相关文章

Zookeeper 源码分析-启动

Zookeeper 源码分析-启动 博客分类: Zookeeper 本文主要介绍了zookeeper启动的过程 运行zkServer.sh start命令可以启动zookeeper.入口的main函数在类中QuorumPeerMain. main函数主要调用了runFromConfig函数,创建了QuorumPeer对象,并且调用了start函数,从而启动了zookeeper. Java代码   public class QuorumPeerMain { protected QuorumPeer

Hadoop学习笔记(二)——zookeeper使用和分析

分布式架构是中心化的设计,就是一个主控机连接多个处理节点,因此保证主控机高可用性十分关键.分布式锁是解决该问题的较好方案,多主控机抢一把锁.Zookeeper就是一套分布式锁管理系统,用于高可靠的维护元数据. 一.应用 1.集群模式 集群模式下配置多个Zookeeper节点,启动Zookeeper集群,Zookeeper会根据配置投票选举一个节点获得分布式锁. 关键配置举例: # The Cluster servers #server.1=192.168.1.10:2887:3887 #serv

完整全面的Java资源库(包括构建、操作、代码分析、编译器、数据库、社区等等)

构建 这里搜集了用来构建应用程序的工具. Apache Maven:Maven使用声明进行构建并进行依赖管理,偏向于使用约定而不是配置进行构建.Maven优于Apache Ant.后者采用了一种过程化的方式进行配置,所以维护起来相当困难.Gradle:Gradle采用增量构建.Gradle通过Groovy编程而不是传统的XML声明进行配置.Gradle可以很好地配合Maven进行依赖管理,并且把Ant脚本当作头等公民.字节码操作 编程操作Java字节码的函数库. ASM:通用底层字节码操作及分析

zookeeper源码分析之五服务端(集群leader)处理请求流程

leader的实现类为LeaderZooKeeperServer,它间接继承自标准ZookeeperServer.它规定了请求到达leader时需要经历的路径: PrepRequestProcessor -> ProposalRequestProcessor ->CommitProcessor -> Leader.ToBeAppliedRequestProcessor ->FinalRequestProcessor 具体情况可以参看代码: @Override protected v

zookeeper源码分析之一服务端处理请求流程

上文: zookeeper源码分析之一服务端启动过程 中,我们介绍了zookeeper服务器的启动过程,其中单机是ZookeeperServer启动,集群使用QuorumPeer启动,那么这次我们分析各自一下消息处理过程: 前文可以看到在 1.在单机情况下NettyServerCnxnFactory中启动ZookeeperServer来处理消息: public synchronized void startup() { if (sessionTracker == null) { createSe

分布式系统的一致性级别划分及Zookeeper一致性级别分析

最近在研究分布式系统的一些理论概念,例如关于分布式系统一致性的讨论,看了一些文章我有一些不解.大多数对分布式系统一致性的划分是将其分为三类:强一致性,顺序一致性以及弱一致性.强一致性(Strict Consistency)也称为:原子一致性(Atomic Consistency).线性一致性(Linearizable Consistency). 在谈到Zookeeper的一致性是哪种级别的一致性问题,以及CAP原则中的C是哪一种一致性级别时有些疑惑. 下面是大多数文章中提到的一致性级别 1. 一

java代码分析及分析工具

java代码分析及分析工具 一个项目从搭建开始,开发的初期往往思路比较清晰,代码也比较清晰.随着时间的推移,业务越来越复杂.代码也就面临着耦合,冗余,甚至杂乱,到最后谁都不敢碰. 作为一个互联网电子商务网站的业务支撑系统,业务复杂不言而喻.从09年开始一直沿用到现在,中间代码经过了多少人的手,留下了多少的坑,已经记不清楚了,谁也说不清了. 代码的维护成本越来越高.代码已经急需做调整和改善.最近项目组专门设立了一个小组,利用业余时间做代码分析的工作,目标对核心代码进行分析并进行设计重构. 代码分析

Java静态代码分析工具Infer

Java静态代码分析工具Infer 作者:chszs,转载需注明.博客主页:http://blog.csdn.net/chszs 一.Infer介绍 Infer是Facebook最新开源的静态程序分析工具,用于在发布移动应用之前对代码进行分析,找出潜在的问题.目前Facebook使用此工具分析Facebook的App,包括Android.iOS.Facebook Messenger和Instagram等. Facebook称该工具帮助其每个月检查出应用潜在的数百个Bug,例如一些空指针访问.资源

$*和[email&#160;protected]之间区别代码分析

#!/bin/bash set 'apple pie' pears peaches for i in $*           /*单引号被去掉,循环单个字符输出*/ do echo $i done [[email protected] Ex_14.02-14.31]# sh 14-14-1 apple pie pears peaches -------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/bash set