1. 问题引入:开两个线程同时对一个全局变量10万次做自加,结果会如何?
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <pthread.h> unsigned int g_cn = 0; void* thread_proc (void* arg) { unsigned int i; for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++) ++g_cn; return NULL; } int main (void) { size_t i; pthread_t tids[2]; int error; for (i = 0; i < sizeof (tids) / sizeof (tids[0]); i++) if ((error = pthread_create (&tids[i], NULL, thread_proc, NULL)) != 0) { fprintf (stderr, "pthread_create: %s\n", strerror (error)); return -1; } for (i = 0; i < sizeof (tids) / sizeof (tids[0]); i++) if ((error = pthread_join (tids[i], NULL)) != 0) { fprintf (stderr, "pthread_join: %s\n", strerror (error)); return -1; } printf ("g_cn = %u\n", g_cn); return 0; }
思考:多执行几次,结果很神奇吧,那么为什么有的时候会出现结果不是20万呢,其实质原因是加法不是原子操作。加法对应的汇编指令至少分为读内存,算加法,写内存三步,而线程的切换可能发生在任何一步,这就引起当一个线程还没完成加法,另一个线程在这个不准确的基础上做了一次加法,结果自然会比正确结果小。而且线程切换的次数越多结果就越不准确,这就需要我们建立一种同步机制来保证数据的可靠性。
2. 互斥量机制:其实质就是加锁解锁
nt pthread_mutex_init (pthread_mutex_t* mutex,const pthread_mutexattr_t* mutexattr);//初始化函数 pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;(和初始化函数的效果一样) int pthread_mutex_lock (pthread_mutex_t* mutex); int pthread_mutex_unlock (pthread_mutex_t* mutex); int pthread_mutex_destroy (pthread_mutex_t* mutex);
编程模型:
1) 互斥量被初始化为非锁定状态;
2) 线程1调用pthread_mutex_lock函数,立即返回,互斥量呈锁定状态;
3) 线程2调用pthread_mutex_lock函数,阻塞等待;
4) 线程1调用pthread_mutex_unlock函数,互斥量呈非锁定状态;
5) 线程2被唤醒,从pthread_mutex_lock函数中返回,互斥量呈锁定状态;
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <pthread.h> unsigned int g_cn = 0; /* pthread_mutex_t g_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; */ pthread_mutex_t g_mtx; void* thread_proc (void* arg) { unsigned int i; for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { pthread_mutex_lock (&g_mtx); ++g_cn; pthread_mutex_unlock (&g_mtx); } return NULL; } int main (void) { size_t i; pthread_t tids[2]; int error; pthread_mutex_init (&g_mtx, NULL); for (i = 0; i < sizeof (tids) / sizeof (tids[0]); i++) if ((error = pthread_create (&tids[i], NULL, thread_proc, NULL)) != 0) { fprintf (stderr, "pthread_create: %s\n", strerror (error)); return -1; } for (i = 0; i < sizeof (tids) / sizeof (tids[0]); i++) if ((error = pthread_join (tids[i], NULL)) != 0) { fprintf (stderr, "pthread_join: %s\n", strerror (error)); return -1; } pthread_mutex_destroy (&g_mtx); printf ("g_cn = %u\n", g_cn); return 0; }
能保证结果每次都是20万。
版权声明:本文为博主原创文章,未经博主允许不得转载。
时间: 2024-10-11 16:57:33