Mysql表读写、索引等操作的sql语句效率优化问题

上次我们说到mysql的一些sql查询方面的优化,包括查看explain执行计划,分析索引等等。今天我们分享一些 分析mysql表读写、索引等等操作的sql语句。

闲话不多说,直接上代码:

反映表的读写压力

SELECT file_name AS file,
    count_read,
    sum_number_of_bytes_read AS total_read,
    count_write,
    sum_number_of_bytes_write AS total_written,
    (sum_number_of_bytes_read + sum_number_of_bytes_write) AS total
 FROM performance_schema.file_summary_by_instance
ORDER BY sum_number_of_bytes_read+ sum_number_of_bytes_write DESC;

反映文件的延迟

SELECT (file_name) AS file,
    count_star AS total,
    CONCAT(ROUND(sum_timer_wait / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘) AS total_latency,
    count_read,
    CONCAT(ROUND(sum_timer_read / 1000000000000, 2), ‘s‘) AS read_latency,
    count_write,
    CONCAT(ROUND(sum_timer_write / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘)AS write_latency
 FROM performance_schema.file_summary_by_instance
ORDER BY sum_timer_wait DESC;

table 的读写延迟

SELECT object_schema AS table_schema,
       object_name AS table_name,
       count_star AS total,
       CONCAT(ROUND(sum_timer_wait / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘) as total_latency,
       CONCAT(ROUND((sum_timer_wait / count_star) / 1000000, 2), ‘us‘) AS avg_latency,
       CONCAT(ROUND(max_timer_wait / 1000000000, 2), ‘ms‘) AS max_latency
 FROM performance_schema.objects_summary_global_by_type
    ORDER BY sum_timer_wait DESC;

查看表操作频度

SELECT object_schema AS table_schema,
      object_name AS table_name,
      count_star AS rows_io_total,
      count_read AS rows_read,
      count_write AS rows_write,
      count_fetch AS rows_fetchs,
      count_insert AS rows_inserts,
      count_update AS rows_updates,
      count_delete AS rows_deletes,
       CONCAT(ROUND(sum_timer_fetch / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘) AS fetch_latency,
       CONCAT(ROUND(sum_timer_insert / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘) AS insert_latency,
       CONCAT(ROUND(sum_timer_update / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘) AS update_latency,
       CONCAT(ROUND(sum_timer_delete / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘) AS delete_latency
   FROM performance_schema.table_io_waits_summary_by_table
    ORDER BY sum_timer_wait DESC ;

索引状况

SELECT OBJECT_SCHEMA AS table_schema,
        OBJECT_NAME AS table_name,
        INDEX_NAME as index_name,
        COUNT_FETCH AS rows_fetched,
        CONCAT(ROUND(SUM_TIMER_FETCH / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘) AS select_latency,
        COUNT_INSERT AS rows_inserted,
        CONCAT(ROUND(SUM_TIMER_INSERT / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘) AS insert_latency,
        COUNT_UPDATE AS rows_updated,
        CONCAT(ROUND(SUM_TIMER_UPDATE / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘) AS update_latency,
        COUNT_DELETE AS rows_deleted,
        CONCAT(ROUND(SUM_TIMER_DELETE / 3600000000000000, 2), ‘h‘)AS delete_latency
FROM performance_schema.table_io_waits_summary_by_index_usage
WHERE index_name IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY sum_timer_wait DESC;

全表扫描情况

SELECT object_schema,
    object_name,
    count_read AS rows_full_scanned
 FROM performance_schema.table_io_waits_summary_by_index_usage
WHERE index_name IS NULL
  AND count_read > 0
ORDER BY count_read DESC;

没有使用的index

SELECT object_schema,
    object_name,
    index_name
  FROM performance_schema.table_io_waits_summary_by_index_usage
 WHERE index_name IS NOT NULL
  AND count_star = 0
  AND object_schema not in (‘mysql‘,‘v_monitor‘)
  AND index_name <> ‘PRIMARY‘
 ORDER BY object_schema, object_name;

糟糕的sql问题摘要

SELECT (DIGEST_TEXT) AS query,
    SCHEMA_NAME AS db,
    IF(SUM_NO_GOOD_INDEX_USED > 0 OR SUM_NO_INDEX_USED > 0, ‘*‘, ‘‘) AS full_scan,
    COUNT_STAR AS exec_count,
    SUM_ERRORS AS err_count,
    SUM_WARNINGS AS warn_count,
    (SUM_TIMER_WAIT) AS total_latency,
    (MAX_TIMER_WAIT) AS max_latency,
    (AVG_TIMER_WAIT) AS avg_latency,
    (SUM_LOCK_TIME) AS lock_latency,
    format(SUM_ROWS_SENT,0) AS rows_sent,
    ROUND(IFNULL(SUM_ROWS_SENT / NULLIF(COUNT_STAR, 0), 0)) AS rows_sent_avg,
    SUM_ROWS_EXAMINED AS rows_examined,
    ROUND(IFNULL(SUM_ROWS_EXAMINED / NULLIF(COUNT_STAR, 0), 0)) AS rows_examined_avg,
    SUM_CREATED_TMP_TABLES AS tmp_tables,
    SUM_CREATED_TMP_DISK_TABLES AS tmp_disk_tables,
    SUM_SORT_ROWS AS rows_sorted,
    SUM_SORT_MERGE_PASSES AS sort_merge_passes,
    DIGEST AS digest,
    FIRST_SEEN AS first_seen,
    LAST_SEEN as last_seen
  FROM performance_schema.events_statements_summary_by_digest d
where d
ORDER BY SUM_TIMER_WAIT DESC
limit 20;

掌握这些sql,你能轻松知道你的库那些表存在问题,然后考虑怎么去优化。

原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/zping/p/12133029.html

时间: 2024-07-29 02:19:45

Mysql表读写、索引等操作的sql语句效率优化问题的相关文章

优化、分析Mysql表读写、索引等操作的sql语句效率优化问题

为什么要优化: 随着实际项目的启动,数据库经过一段时间的运行,最初的数据库设置,会与实际数据库运行性能会有一些差异,这时我们 就需要做一个优化调整. 数据库优化这个课题较大,可分为四大类: >主机性能>内存使用性能>网络传输性能>SQL语句执行性能[软件工程师]下面列出一些数据库SQL优化方案: (01)选择最有效率的表名顺序(笔试常考) 数据库的解析器按照从右到左的顺序处理FROM子句中的表名,FROM子句中写在最后的表将被最先处理,在FROM子句中包含多个表的情况下,你必须选择

SQL语句效率优化--持续更新

1 delete与in搭配使用,效率特别低,如下可解决该问题,not in同理 /*正常写法*/ DELETE from activity where id in ( SELECT id from activity_data); /*优化后写法*/ DELETE from activity where id in (select * from (SELECT id from activity_data) t); 原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/cdut-yy/p/120

MySql数据库3【优化2】sql语句的优化

1.SELECT语句优化 1).利用LIMIT 1取得唯一行[控制结果集的行数] 有时,当你要查询一张表是,你知道自己只需要看一行.你可能会去的一条十分独特的记录,或者只是刚好检查了任何存在的记录数,他们都满足了你的WHERE子句.在这种情况下,增加一个LIMIT 1会令你的查询更加有效.这样数据库引擎发现只有1后将停止扫描,而不是去扫描整个表或索引. 2).不要使用BY RAND()命令 这是一个令很多新手程序员会掉进去的陷阱.你可能不知不觉中制造了一个可怕的平静.这个陷阱在你是用BY RAN

mysql操作命令梳理(5)-执行sql语句查询即mysql状态说明

在日常mysql运维中,经常要查询当前mysql下正在执行的sql语句及其他在跑的mysql相关线程,这就用到mysql processlist这个命令了.mysql> show processlist;            //查询正在执行的sql语句mysql> show full processlist;       //查询正在执行的完整sql语句mysql> kill connection id           //停掉processlist查询出的某个线程,id是对应的

解决:hibernate+mysql中文查询不出结果,SQL语句也正常

今天做一个项目挣点外快hibernate+mysql数据库,Java后台全部正常,查看Java想数据库发送的语句也是正常的,但是中文就是查询不出结果,中文在Java中没有乱码,用new String(or_name.getBytes("ISO-8859-1"), "UTF-8"); 后台没有乱码,尝试了网上的很多方法都不行,getString或者getParamter都不行 最后感觉是mysql的问题,然后将mysql的安装目录下的my.ini中的两个地方改为utf

hiberante对象方式的投影操作与sql语句的投影方式(聚集函数的hibernate用法)

hiberante对象方式的投影操作与sql语句的投影方式(聚集函数的hibernate用法) 最近用到了hibernate的投影,写日记出来记录一下. (⊙o⊙)… 前提:搭配好hibernate环境了. myclass指的是已经映射好的实体类 如下3个函数是我写来测试投影的方法:   此三个方法我写在basedao中(基础dao类,做常用dao操作) 1 /** 2 * 斌临城下增加! 3 * <p/> 4 * ---(⊙o⊙)… 5 * <p/> 6 * * 7 */ 8 p

SQL语句的优化

一.问题的提出 在应用系统开发初期,由于开发数据库数据比较少,对于查询SQL语句,复杂视图的的编写等体会不出SQL语句各种写法的性能优劣,但是如果将应用系统提交实际应用后,随着数据库中数据的增加,系统的响应速度就成为目前系统需要解决的最主要的问题之一.系统优化中一个很重要的方面就是SQL语句的优化.对于海量数据,劣质SQL语句和优质SQL语句之间的速度差别可以达到上百倍,可见对于一个系统不是简单地能实现其功能就可,而是要写出高质量的SQL语句,提高系统的可用性. 在多数情况下,Oracle使用索

关于sql语句的优化

最近在做mysql的数据库优化以及对sql语句优化的指导,写了一点文档,这个大家共勉一下! 数据库参数进行优化所获得的性能提升全部加起来只占数据库应用系统性能提升的40%左右,其余60%的系统性能提升全部来自对应用程序的优化.许多优化专家甚至认为对应用程序的优化可以得到80%的系统性能提升.因此可以肯定,通过优化应用程序来对数据库系统进行优化能获得更大的收益. 通常可分为两个方面: SQL语句的优化和数据库性能调优.应用程序对数据库的操作最终要表现为SQL语句对数据库的操作.而数据库性能调优是结

谈谈SQL 语句的优化技术

在SQL server 的性能优化过程中,TSQL的语句优化是很重要的一环.当您使用各种手段找出系统最需要优化的语句后,应该如何对该语句进行优化呢?下面列出一些TSQL 语句优化的常见技巧. 1.     语句的执行计划分析 首先要对该语句的执行计划(execution plan)进行分析,找出语句运行慢的原因.比如说, <>在检查执行计划是否包含table scan /index scan等昂贵的操作? <>对table, worktable是否进行了大量的逻辑读? <&g