对各种方法实现get方法的性能进行了一个测试。
总共有5个测试,,每个测试都是执行1亿次
1. 直接通过Java的get方法
2.通过高性能的ReflectAsm库进行测试
3.通过Java Class类自带的反射获得Method测试
4.使用Java自带的Property类获取Method测试
5.BeanUtils的getProperty测试
1 测试用Bean类
测试定义了如下一个bean类。
public class SimpleBean { private String name; public String getName() { return name; } public SimpleBean setName(String name) { this.name = name; } }
注意定义要严格遵守JavaBean规范,否则在使用和反射相关工具时会出现NoSuchMethodException异常,或者导致性能非常差,JavaBean规范中最重要的几点如下:
1.类必须是public, 拥有public无参构造器,这样能够通过反射newInstance()动态构建对象. String className = ...; Class beanClass = Class.forName(className); Object beanInstance = beanClass.newInstance(); 2.因为反射newInstance使用的是无参构造器, 所以对象实例化和配置是分开的 3.每一个property都有一个public的getter和setter方法, 命名方式是get/set+首字母大写的property名
经测试在SimpleBean为public时,1亿次调用method.invoke方法:
javaReflectGet 100000000 times using 218 ms
而SimpleBean为默认包可见时,1一亿次调用method.invoke方法:
javaReflectGet 100000000 times using 12955 ms
2.测试代码
public class TestIterator { private long times = 100_000_000L; private SimpleBean bean; private String formatter = "%s %d times using %d ms"; @Before public void setUp() throws Exception { bean = new SimpleBean(); bean.setName("haoyifen"); } //直接通过Java的get方法 @Test public void directGet() { Stopwatch watch = Stopwatch.createStarted(); for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) { bean.getName(); } watch.stop(); String result = String.format(formatter, "directGet", times, watch.elapsed(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)); System.out.println(result); } //通过高性能的ReflectAsm库进行测试,仅进行一次methodAccess获取 @Test public void reflectAsmGet() { MethodAccess methodAccess = MethodAccess.get(SimpleBean.class); Stopwatch watch = Stopwatch.createStarted(); for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) { methodAccess.invoke(bean, "getName"); } watch.stop(); String result = String.format(formatter, "reflectAsmGet", times, watch.elapsed(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)); System.out.println(result); } //通过Java Class类自带的反射获得Method测试,仅进行一次method获取 @Test public void javaReflectGet() throws IllegalAccessException, NoSuchMethodException, InvocationTargetException { Method getName = SimpleBean.class.getMethod("getName"); Stopwatch watch = Stopwatch.createStarted(); for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) { getName.invoke(bean); } watch.stop(); String result = String.format(formatter, "javaReflectGet", times, watch.elapsed(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)); System.out.println(result); } //使用Java自带的Property属性获取Method测试,仅进行一次method获取 @Test public void propertyGet() throws IllegalAccessException, NoSuchMethodException, InvocationTargetException, IntrospectionException { Method method = null; BeanInfo beanInfo = Introspector.getBeanInfo(SimpleBean.class); PropertyDescriptor[] propertyDescriptors = beanInfo.getPropertyDescriptors(); for (PropertyDescriptor propertyDescriptor : propertyDescriptors) { if (propertyDescriptor.getName().equals("name")) { method = propertyDescriptor.getReadMethod(); break; } } Stopwatch watch = Stopwatch.createStarted(); for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) { method.invoke(bean); } watch.stop(); String result = String.format(formatter, "propertyGet", times, watch.elapsed(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)); System.out.println(result); } //BeanUtils的getProperty测试 @Test public void beanUtilsGet() throws IllegalAccessException, NoSuchMethodException, InvocationTargetException { Stopwatch watch = Stopwatch.createStarted(); for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) { BeanUtils.getProperty(bean, "name"); } watch.stop(); String result = String.format(formatter, "beanUtilsGet", times, watch.elapsed(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)); System.out.println(result); } }
3.测试结果
在4核[email protected]机器上跑以上测试,经过多次测量,基本在以下数值范围附近,测试数据如下:
1. directGet 100000000 times using 37 ms
2. reflectAsmGet 100000000 times using 39 ms
3. javaReflectGet 100000000 times using 222 ms
4. propertyGet 100000000 times using 335 ms
5. beanUtilsGet 100000000 times using 20066 ms
4.结果分析
1.使用reflectAsm库的性能能和直接调用get方法持平
2.Java自带的反射性能大致为直接get的1/6和1/9.
3.BeanUtils的getProperty非常的慢,为直接get性能的1/500,为Java自带反射性能的1/100和1/60.
为什么BeanUtils的getProperty方法性能这么慢?