mysql重连,连接丢失:The last packet successfully received from the server

原文地址:http://nkcoder.github.io/blog/20140712/mysql-reconnect-packet-lost/

1.1 错误信息:

Caused by: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: The last packet successfully received from the server was 20,820,001 milliseconds ago.  The last packet sent successfully to the server was 20,820,002 milliseconds ago. is longer than the server configured value of ‘wait_timeout‘. You should consider either expiring and/or testing connection validity before use in your application, increasing the server configured values for client timeouts, or using the Connector/J connection property ‘autoReconnect=true‘ to avoid this problem.
		at sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor29.newInstance(Unknown Source) ~[na:na]
		at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) ~[na:1.7.0_51]
		at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:526) ~[na:1.7.0_51]
		at com.mysql.jdbc.Util.handleNewInstance(Util.java:411) ~[mysql-connector-java-5.1.29.jar:na]
		at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createCommunicationsException(SQLError.java:1129) ~[mysql-connector-java-5.1.29.jar:na]
		at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.send(MysqlIO.java:3988) ~[mysql-connector-java-5.1.29.jar:na]
		at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sendCommand(MysqlIO.java:2598) ~[mysql-connector-java-5.1.29.jar:na]
		at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:2778) ~[mysql-connector-java-5.1.29.jar:na]
		at com.mysql.jdbc.ConnectionImpl.execSQL(ConnectionImpl.java:2828) ~[mysql-connector-java-5.1.29.jar:na]
		at com.mysql.jdbc.ConnectionImpl.setAutoCommit(ConnectionImpl.java:5372) ~[mysql-connector-java-5.1.29.jar:na]
		at com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewProxyConnection.setAutoCommit(NewProxyConnection.java:881) ~[c3p0-0.9.1.1.jar:0.9.1.1]
		at org.quartz.impl.jdbcjobstore.AttributeRestoringConnectionInvocationHandler.setAutoCommit(AttributeRestoringConnectionInvocationHandler.java:98) ~[quartz-2.2.1.jar:na]

1.2 解决方法

- 如果使用的是JDBC,在JDBC URL上添加?autoReconnect=true,如:

jdbc:mysql://10.10.10.10:3306/mydb?autoReconnect=true

- 如果是在Spring中使用DBCP连接池,在定义datasource增加属性validationQuerytestOnBorrow,如:

<bean id="vrsRankDataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource" destroy-method="close">
    <property name="driverClassName" value="${jdbc.driverClassName}" />
    <property name="url" value="${countNew.jdbc.url}" />
    <property name="username" value="${countNew.jdbc.user}" />
    <property name="password" value="${countNew.jdbc.pwd}" />
    <property name="validationQuery" value="SELECT 1" />
    <property name="testOnBorrow" value="true"/>
</bean>

- 如果是在Spring中使用c3p0连接池,则在定义datasource的时候,添加属性testConnectionOnCheckintestConnectionOnCheckout,如:

<bean name="cacheCloudDB" class="com.mchange.v2.c3p0.ComboPooledDataSource">
    <property name="driverClass" value="${jdbc.driver}"/>
    <property name="jdbcUrl" value="${cache.url}"/>
    <property name="user" value="${cache.user}"/>
    <property name="password" value="${cache.password}"/>
    <property name="initialPoolSize" value="10"/>
    <property name="maxPoolSize" value="${cache.maxPoolSize}"/>
    <property name="testConnectionOnCheckin" value="false"/>
    <property name="testConnectionOnCheckout" value="true"/>
    <property name="preferredTestQuery" value="SELECT 1"/>
</bean>

参考

附录分析

When a c3p0-proxied Connection throws an SQLException, c3p0 examines
the Exception and the Connection to make a judgement about whether
the problem implies that the Connection should no longer be included
in the pool. c3p0 tests the Connection, and if the test fails,  the
Connection will be excluded from the pool.

What c3p0 is telling you here is that a Connection that previously
signalled an error and then failed a Connection test is still in use,
and has signalled another error. From c3p0‘s perspective, this is a
non-issue, it just means c3p0 doesn‘t have to do any kind of checks
or notifications, the Connection is already gone as far as the pool
is concerned. But c3p0 wonders why you‘d still be using such a
Connection, and warns you about it.

Usually, if a client continues to use a Connection that c3p0 has
correctly identified as broken, all further uses will provoke such an
exception, and the fix is to close the Connection and start over when
an application‘s Connection turns out to be dead. But, by the error
you‘re getting, it looks like your Connection is still live and okay
-- it‘s clearly communicating with the database. So, the issue is,
why did c3p0 deem the Connection dead if it is not?

If you turn on DEBUG level logging (relevant loggers would be
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.NewPooledConnection,
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.C3P0PooledConnectionPool, and
com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.DefaultConnectionTester, unless you‘ve
defined your own ConnectionTester), you can trace the testing and
invalidation of Connections, and try to understand why Connections
that seem okay are testing as broken. That will give you better
information about what‘s going on.

That said, the only cost of this behavior is disconcerting warning
messages and somewhat faster churn of Connections through the pool.
c3p0 is erring on the side of caution -- it has reason to believe a
Connection is bad, so it‘s been excluded from the pool. It‘d be nice
to know why apparently good Connections are failing Connection tests,
but if it is an infrequent occurrence, it‘s very little to worry
about. (If it‘s happening a lot, you should track it down.)原文地址:http://sourceforge.net/p/c3p0/mailman/message/18310863/
时间: 2024-08-09 19:51:42

mysql重连,连接丢失:The last packet successfully received from the server的相关文章

Cause: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: The last packet successfully received from the server was 78,050,512 milliseconds ago.

今天访问已经架上服务器的网站,报错: Cause: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: The last packet successfully received from the server was 78,050,512 milliseconds ago. The last packet sent successfully to the server was 78,050,512 milliseconds ago.

The last packet successfully received from the server was 20,519 milliseconds ago. The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago.

本地升级了下MySQL的版本,从5.6升为5.7,数据文件直接拷贝的,项目查询数据库报错: Could not retrieve transation read-only status server The last packet successfully received from the server was 20,519 milliseconds ago.  The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds

mysql重连,连接丢失:The last packet successfully received from the server--转载

1.1 错误信息: Caused by: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: The last packet successfully received from the server was 20,820,001 milliseconds ago. The last packet sent successfully to the server was 20,820,002 milliseconds ago. is l

mysql The last packet successfully received from t

本人博客开始迁移,博客整个架构自己搭建及编码 http://www.cookqq.com/lookBlog.action?id=c7d6978a-0dc0-4648-9020-2b81d859a243 mysql服务器最近老是报错,内容如下: The last packet successfully received from the server was 65,502,275 milliseconds ago.  The last packet sent successfully to the

mysql 连接丢失错误解决(转载)

1.1 错误信息: Caused by: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: The last packet successfully received from the server was 20,820,001 milliseconds ago. The last packet sent successfully to the server was 20,820,002 milliseconds ago. is l

关于MySQL的wait_timeout连接超时问题报错解决方案

bug回顾 : 想必大家在用MySQL时都会遇到连接超时的问题,如下图所示: ### Cause: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: The last packet successfully received from the server was 47,795,922 milliseconds ago. The last packet sent successfully to the server was 47,7

mysql重连,连接丢失问题:The last packet sent successfully to the server was……

1.log错误日志: -org.hibernate.exception.JDBCConnectionException: The last packet successfully received from the server was 51,999,860 milliseconds ago. The last packet sent successfully to the server was 51,999,860 milliseconds ago. is longer than the se

myql_链接丢失异常_mybaits _等框架_报错_The last packet successfully

mysql 8小时问题的解决方法 转发: 别看是英文 ,写的很好 ,才转 Use Hibernate + MYSQL database development, link timeout problem: com.mysql.jdbc.CommunicationsException: The last packet successfully received from the server was58129 seconds ago.The last packet sent successfull

Mysql高手系列 - 第27篇:mysql如何确保数据不丢失的?我们借鉴这种设计思想实现热点账户高并发设计及跨库转账问题

Mysql系列的目标是:通过这个系列从入门到全面掌握一个高级开发所需要的全部技能. 欢迎大家加我微信itsoku一起交流java.算法.数据库相关技术. 这是Mysql系列第27篇. 本篇文章我们先来看一下mysql是如何确保数据不丢失的,通过本文我们可以了解mysql内部确保数据不丢失的原理,学习里面优秀的设计要点,然后我们再借鉴这些优秀的设计要点进行实践应用,加深理解. 预备知识 mysql内部是使用b+树的结构将数据存储在磁盘中,b+树中节点对应mysql中的页,mysql和磁盘交互的最小