“小明,多系统的session共享,怎么处理?”“Redis缓存啊!” “小明,我想实现一个简单的消息队列?”“Redis缓存啊!”
“小明,分布式锁这玩意有什么方案?”“Redis缓存啊!” “小明,公司系统响应如蜗牛,咋整?”“Redis缓存啊!”
本着研究的精神,我们来分析下小明的第四个问题。
准备:
Idea2019.03/Gradle6.0.1/Maven3.6.3/JDK11.0.4/Lombok0.28/SpringBoot2.2.4RELEASE/mybatisPlus3.3.0/Soul2.1.2/
Dubbo2.7.5/Druid1.2.21/Zookeeper3.5.5/Mysql8.0.11/Vue2.5/Redis3.2
难度: 新手--战士--老兵--大师
目标:
- Spring优雅整合Redis做数据库缓存
步骤:
为了遇见各种问题,同时保持时效性,我尽量使用最新的软件版本。源码地址:https://github.com/xiexiaobiao/vehicle-shop-admin
1 先说结论
Redis缓存不是金弹,若系统DB毫无压力,系统性能瓶颈不在DB上,不建议强加缓存层!
- 增加业务复杂度:同一缓存必须被全部相关方法所覆盖,如订单缓存,只要涉及到订单数据更新的方法都要进行缓存逻辑处理。
同时,KV存储时,因各方法返回的类型不同,这样就需要多个缓存池,但各方法后台的数据又存在关联,往往导致一个方法需
要处理关联的多个缓存,从而形成网状处理逻辑。
2. 存在并发问题:缓存没有锁机制,B线程进行DB更新,同时A线程请求数据,缓存中存在即返回,但B线程还未更新到缓存,导
致缓存与DB不一致;或者A线程B线程都进行DB更新,但写入缓存的顺序发生颠倒,也会导致缓存与DB不一致,请看官君想想如何解决;
3.内存消耗:小数据量可直接全部进内存,但海量数据不可能全部直接进入Redis,机器吃不消!可考虑只缓存DB数据索引,然后配合
“布隆过滤器”拦截无效请求,有效请求再去DB查询;
4. 缓存位置:缓存注解的方法,执行时序上应尽量靠近DB,远离前端,如放dao层,请看官君思考下为啥。
适用场景:1.确认DB为系统性能瓶颈,2.数据内容稳定,低频更新,高频查询,如历史订单数据;3.热点数据,如新上市商品;
2 步骤
2.1 原理
这里我说的是注解模式,有四个注解,SpringCache缓存原理即注解+拦截器 org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheInterceptor
对方法进行拦截处理:
@Cacheable:可标记在类或方法上。标记在类上则缓存该类所有方法的返回值。请求方法时,先在缓存进行key匹配,存在则直接取缓存数据并返回。主要参数表:
@CacheEvict:从缓存中移除相应数据。主要参数表:
@CachePut:方法支持缓存功能。与@Cacheable不同的是使用@CachePut标注的方法在执行前不会去检查缓存中是否存在之前执行过的结果,
而是每次都会执行该方法,并将执行结果以键值对的形式存入指定的缓存中。主要参数表:
@Caching: 多个Cache注解组合使用,比如新增用户时,同时要删除其他缓存,并更新用户信息缓存,即以上三个注解的集合。
2.2 编码
项目有五个微服务,我仅改造了customer服务模块:
引入依赖,build.gradle文件:
Redis配置项,resources/config/application-dev.yml文件:
文件: com.biao.shop.customer.conf.RedisConf
@Configuration @EnableCaching public class RedisConf { @Bean public RedisCacheManager cacheManager(RedisConnectionFactory redisConnectionFactory){ return RedisCacheManager.create(redisConnectionFactory); } @Bean public CacheManager cacheManager() { // configure and return an implementation of Spring‘s CacheManager SPI SimpleCacheManager cacheManager = new SimpleCacheManager(); cacheManager.setCaches(Arrays.asList(new ConcurrentMapCache("default"))); return cacheManager; } @Bean public RedisTemplate<String,Object> redisTemplate(RedisConnectionFactory factory){ RedisTemplate<String,Object> redisTemplate = new RedisTemplate<>(); redisTemplate.setConnectionFactory(factory); // 设置key的序列化器 redisTemplate.setKeySerializer(new StringRedisSerializer()); // 设置value的序列化器,使用Jackson 2,将对象序列化为JSON Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer jackson2JsonRedisSerializer = new Jackson2JsonRedisSerializer(Object.class); // json转对象类,不设置,默认的会将json转成hashmap ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper(); mapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.ALL, JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.ANY); mapper.enableDefaultTyping(ObjectMapper.DefaultTyping.NON_FINAL); jackson2JsonRedisSerializer.setObjectMapper(mapper); return redisTemplate; } }
以上代码解析:1.声明缓存管理器CacheManager,会创建一个切面(aspect)并触发Spring缓存注解的切点,根据类或者方法所使用的注解以及缓存的状态,
这个切面会从缓存中获取数据,将数据添加到缓存之中或者从缓存中移除某个值 2. RedisTemplate即为Redis连接器,实际上即为jedis客户端。
文件: com.biao.shop.customer.impl.ShopClientServiceImpl
@org.springframework.stereotype.Service @Slf4j public class ShopClientServiceImpl extends ServiceImpl<ShopClientDao, ShopClientEntity> implements ShopClientService { private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ShopClientServiceImpl.class); private ShopClientDao shopClientDao; @Autowired public ShopClientServiceImpl(ShopClientDao shopClientDao){ this.shopClientDao = shopClientDao; } @Override public String getMaxClientUuId() { return shopClientDao.selectList(new LambdaQueryWrapper<ShopClientEntity>() .isNotNull(ShopClientEntity::getClientUuid).orderByDesc(ShopClientEntity::getClientUuid)) .stream().limit(1).collect(Collectors.toList()) .get(0).getClientUuid(); } @Override @Caching(put = @CachePut(cacheNames = {"shopClient"},key = "#root.args[0].clientUuid"), evict = @CacheEvict(cacheNames = {"shopClientPage","shopClientPlateList","shopClientList"},allEntries = true)) public int createClient(ShopClientEntity clientEntity) { clientEntity.setGenerateDate(LocalDateTime.now()); return shopClientDao.insert(clientEntity); } /** */ @Override @CacheEvict(cacheNames = {"shopClient","shopClientPage","shopClientPlateList","shopClientList"},allEntries = true) public int deleteBatchById(Collection<Integer> ids) { logger.info("deleteBatchById 删除Redis缓存"); return shopClientDao.deleteBatchIds(ids); } @Override @CacheEvict(cacheNames = {"shopClient","shopClientPage","shopClientPlateList","shopClientList"},allEntries = true) public int deleteById(int id) { logger.info("deleteById 删除Redis缓存"); return shopClientDao.deleteById(id); } @Override @Caching(evict = {@CacheEvict(cacheNames = "shopClient",key = "#root.args[0]"), @CacheEvict(cacheNames = {"shopClientPage","shopClientPlateList","shopClientList"},allEntries = true)}) public int deleteByUUid(String uuid) { logger.info("deleteByUUid 删除Redis缓存"); QueryWrapper<ShopClientEntity> qw = new QueryWrapper<>(); qw.eq(true,"uuid",uuid); return shopClientDao.delete(qw); } @Override @Caching(put = @CachePut(cacheNames = "shopClient",key = "#root.args[0].clientUuid"), evict = @CacheEvict(cacheNames = {"shopClientPage","shopClientPlateList","shopClientList"},allEntries = true)) public int updateClient(ShopClientEntity clientEntity) { logger.info("updateClient 更新Redis缓存"); clientEntity.setModifyDate(LocalDateTime.now()); return shopClientDao.updateById(clientEntity); } @Override @CacheEvict(cacheNames = {"shopClient","shopClientPage","shopClientPlateList","shopClientList"},allEntries = true) public int addPoint(String uuid,int pointToAdd) { ShopClientEntity clientEntity = this.queryByUuId(uuid); log.debug(clientEntity.toString()); clientEntity.setPoint(Objects.isNull(clientEntity.getPoint()) ? 0 : clientEntity.getPoint() + pointToAdd); return shopClientDao.updateById(clientEntity); } @Override @Cacheable(cacheNames = "shopClient",key = "#root.args[0]") public ShopClientEntity queryByUuId(String uuid) { logger.info("queryByUuId 未使用Redis缓存"); QueryWrapper<ShopClientEntity> qw = new QueryWrapper<>(); qw.eq(true,"client_uuid",uuid); return shopClientDao.selectOne(qw); } @Override @Cacheable(cacheNames = "shopClientById",key = "#root.args[0]") public ShopClientEntity queryById(int id) { logger.info("queryById 未使用Redis缓存"); return shopClientDao.selectById(id); } @Override @Cacheable(cacheNames = "shopClientPage") public PageInfo<ShopClientEntity> listClient(Integer current, Integer size, String clientUuid, String name, String vehiclePlate, String phone) { logger.info("listClient 未使用Redis缓存"); QueryWrapper<ShopClientEntity> qw = new QueryWrapper<>(); Map<String,Object> map = new HashMap<>(4); map.put("client_uuid",clientUuid); map.put("vehicle_plate",vehiclePlate); map.put("phone",phone); // "name" 模糊匹配 boolean valid = Objects.isNull(name); qw.allEq(true,map,false).like(!valid,"client_name",name); PageHelper.startPage(current,size); List<ShopClientEntity> clientEntities = shopClientDao.selectList(qw); return PageInfo.of(clientEntities); } // java Stream @Override @Cacheable(cacheNames = "shopClientPlateList") public List<String> listPlate() { logger.info("listPlate 未使用Redis缓存"); List<ShopClientEntity> clientEntities = shopClientDao.selectList(new LambdaQueryWrapper<ShopClientEntity>().isNotNull(ShopClientEntity::getVehiclePlate)); return clientEntities.stream().map(ShopClientEntity::getVehiclePlate).collect(Collectors.toList()); } @Override @Cacheable(cacheNames = "shopClientList",key = "#root.args[0].toString()") public List<ShopClientEntity> listByClientDto(ClientQueryDTO clientQueryDTO) { logger.info("listByClientDto 未使用Redis缓存"); QueryWrapper<ShopClientEntity> qw = new QueryWrapper<>(); boolean phoneFlag = Objects.isNull(clientQueryDTO.getPhone()); boolean clientNameFlag = Objects.isNull(clientQueryDTO.getClientName()); boolean vehicleSeriesFlag = Objects.isNull(clientQueryDTO.getVehicleSeries()); boolean vehiclePlateFlag = Objects.isNull(clientQueryDTO.getVehiclePlate()); //如有null的条件直接不参与查询 qw.eq(!phoneFlag,"phone",clientQueryDTO.getPhone()) .like(!clientNameFlag,"client_name",clientQueryDTO.getClientName()) .like(!vehicleSeriesFlag,"vehicle_plate",clientQueryDTO.getVehiclePlate()) .like(!vehiclePlateFlag,"vehicle_series",clientQueryDTO.getVehicleSeries()); return shopClientDao.selectList(qw); } }
以上代码解析:
1. 因方法返回类型不同,故建立了5个缓存 2. 使用SpEL表达式#root.args[0]取得方法第一个参数,使用#result取得返回对象,
用于构造key 3. 对于@Cacheable不能使用#result返回对象做key值,如queryById(int id)方法,会导致NPE,,因为此注解将在方法执行前先
进入缓存匹配,而#result则是在方法执行后计算 4. @Caching注解可一次集合多个注解,如deleteByUUid(String uuid)方法,删除一个用户记录,
需同时进行更新shopClient,并清空其他几个缓存。
2.3 测试
运行起来整个项目,启动顺序:souladmin -> soulbootstrap -> zookeeper -> authority -> customer -> stock -> order -> business -> vue前端 ,
进入后端管理页: 按页浏览客户信息,分别点击页签:
可以看到缓存shopClientPage缓存了4项数据,key值即为方法的参数组合,再去点击页签,则系统后台无DB请求记录输出,说明直接使用了缓存:
编辑客户信息,我随意打开了两个:
可以看到缓存shopClientById增加了两个对象,再去点击编辑,则系统后台无DB查询记录输出,说明直接使用了缓存:
按条件查询客户:
可以看到缓存shopClientPage增加一项,因为key值不一样,故独立为一项缓存数据,多次点查询,则系统后台无DB查询SQL输出,说明直接使用了缓存:
新增客户:
可以看到shopClientPage缓存将会被清空,同时增加一个shopClient缓存的对象,即同时进行了多个缓存池操作:
问题解答:
前面说到的两个问题:
1.多线程问题,可配合DB事务机制,进行缓存延时双删,每次DB更新前,先删除缓存中对象,更新后,再去删除一次缓存中对象,
2.缓存方法位置问题,按照前端到后端的“倒金字塔模型”,越靠近前端,缓存数据对象被其他业务逻辑更新的可能性越大,靠近DB,能尽量保证每次DB的更新都能被缓存逻辑感知。
全文完!
我的其他文章:
只写原创,敬请关注
原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/xxbiao/p/12593525.html