Erlang Abstract Format并不难懂,只是枯燥一点罢了,如果把Abstract Format的文档翻译出来,其实就是Erlang教科书中语法入门的部分. Erlang Abstract Format实际上是用Erlang代码的AST,下面通过一些真切的实例代码了解一下它的一些细节.
首先,Erlang Abstract Format里面包含一些概念,我会在下面的描述中把涉及到的概念字体加粗.请注意概念之间的层次关系.Erlang代码本身使用非常扁平的module组织,每一个module是由一系列forms组成的.这些forms分成两大类:attributes和函数声明 见下图.
Attribute
attributes相对比较简单,我们先从一个只有attributes没有任何函数声明的module开始
-module(k). -compile(export_all). -compile({parse_transform,print_form}). -export([test/0]). -url("http://cnblogs.com/me-sa/"). -record(student,{class,id}). -record(player,{id=0,name=[],level}).
上面代码对应的Abstract Format如下:
[{attribute,1,file,{"k.erl",1}}, {attribute,1,module,k}, {attribute,2,compile,export_all}, {attribute,4,export,[{test,0}]}, {attribute,5,url,"http://cnblogs.com/me-sa/"}, {attribute,6,record, {student,[{record_field,6,{atom,6,class}}, {record_field,6,{atom,6,id}}]}}, {attribute,7,record, {player,[{record_field,7,{atom,7,id},{integer,7,0}}, {record_field,7,{atom,7,name},{nil,7}}, {record_field,7,{atom,7,level}}]}}, {eof,10}]
我们可以一一对照上面思维导图,可以看到上面每一行代码包括record定义在内在Abstract Format层面看都是attribute.里面不断出现的数字是代码所在行数,这个信息是非常重要的,在编译时提示代码出错行,运行时报错包含代码行数都要用到它.Erlang最新版报错的时候已经包含了出错的代码所在行,而之前这个功能是没有的,工作在蛮荒纪的erlanger,搞了一个smart_exceptions的项目来实现这个功能: https://github.com/thomasl/smart_exceptions/tree/master/stable 言归正传,上面需要细说的form是record的定义,在有record字段初始值的情况,结构会稍复杂一点:{record_field,LINE,Name,Value}.比如player的id=0,对应的Form是{record_field,7,{atom,7,id},{integer,7,0}},id的初始值0是一个字面常量,记作{integer,7,0},在Erlang
Abstract Format文档里面字面常量被称为Atomic literals,包含四种:atom integer string float,见下图
Function declarations
说过了attribute,下面我们看下函数声明部分,这里有一个概念Patterns,它特指function或fun的参数列表.我们做几个简单的方法出来:
-module(a). -compile(export_all). -export([test/0]). -record(student,{class,id}). -record(player,{id=0,name=[],level}). test()-> "hello world!". test(a,[1,2]) -> "a:[1,2]"; test(12.5,100)-> "test". test([]) -> empty; test(abc) -> "atom test". foo(a)-> {b,100}. bar({1,2},12)-> [1,2,3,4,5,6]. k(Num) when Num >1000 -> bigger_than_100; k(Num) -> whatever. call(1000)-> k(1000); call(1002)-> erlang:now().
它对应的Abstract Format是:
[{attribute,1,file,{"a.erl",1}}, {attribute,1,module,a}, {attribute,2,compile,export_all}, {attribute,4,export,[{test,0}]}, {attribute,6,record, {student, [{record_field,6,{atom,6,class}},{record_field,6,{atom,6,id}}]}}, {attribute,7,record, {player, [{record_field,7,{atom,7,id},{integer,7,0}}, {record_field,7,{atom,7,name},{nil,7}}, {record_field,7,{atom,7,level}}]}}, {function,10,test,0,[{clause,10,[],[],[{string,11,"hello world!"}]}]}, {function,13,test,2, [{clause,13, [{atom,13,a}, {cons,13,{integer,13,1},{cons,13,{integer,13,2},{nil,13}}}], [], [{string,14,"a:[1,2]"}]}, {clause,15, [{float,15,12.5},{integer,15,100}], [], [{string,16,"test"}]}]}, {function,18,test,1, [{clause,18,[{nil,18}],[],[{atom,19,empty}]}, {clause,20,[{atom,20,abc}],[],[{string,21,"atom test"}]}]}, {function,24,foo,1, [{clause,24, [{atom,24,a}], [], [{tuple,25,[{atom,25,b},{integer,25,100}]}]}]}, {function,27,bar,2, [{clause,27, [{tuple,27,[{integer,27,1},{integer,27,2}]},{integer,27,12}], [], [{cons,28, {integer,28,1}, {cons,28, {integer,28,2}, {cons,28, {integer,28,3}, {cons,28, {integer,28,4}, {cons,28, {integer,28,5}, {cons,28,{integer,28,6},{nil,28}}}}}}}]}]}, {function,30,k,1, [{clause,30, [{var,30,‘Num‘}], [[{op,30,‘>‘,{var,30,‘Num‘},{integer,30,1000}}]], [{atom,31,bigger_than_100}]}, {clause,32,[{var,32,‘Num‘}],[],[{atom,33,whatever}]}]}, {function,36,call,1, [{clause,36, [{integer,36,1000}], [], [{call,37,{atom,37,k},[{integer,37,1000}]}]}, {clause,38, [{integer,38,1002}], [], [{call,39,{remote,39,{atom,39,erlang},{atom,39,now}},[]}]}]}, {eof,41}]
看上面的函数声明,function里面包含一个或者多个function clauses,比如:
1 2 3 |
|
这段代码就很好玩了,它在形式上已经非常贴近Clojure(好吧,Lisp行不行)里面函数定义的语法了:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
再看一下函数调用,erlang:now().这一句的调用对应的是: [{call,39,{remote,39,{atom,39,erlang},{atom,39,now}},[]}]}]} 看到这里能想起来Erlang里面对Local Call和Remote Call的定义了吧. 上面的代码里面还可以看到Guard的表达形式:
[[{op,30,‘>‘,{var,30,‘Num‘},{integer,30,1000}}]].
除了function clasuse之外,还有 if clauses, case clauses and catch clauses 就不再细说.深入函数体内部就是各种表达式, 方法体里面包含了一些表达式Expressions,Expressions和Patterns表示方式是一样的.比如A
= lists:seq(1,10).这样一个表达式,它的Abstract Format其实很好的解释了这里等号其实是一个匹配运算.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
除了上面这些"普通"的东西,当然还有列表解析和二进制数据处理相关的语法,下面通过两个简单的例子看下:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 |
|
对于Erlang数据结构中的王者List需要仔细观察下,它的表达形式是:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
|
说到这里我们可以把概念之间的层次关系梳理出来了:
Run! Run!
上面啰嗦了那么多细节,那从Abstract Format如何到可执行的代码呢?下面我们就完成这个过程:
3> {ok, MTs, _} = erl_scan:string("-module(t)."). {ok,[{‘-‘,1}, {atom,1,module}, {‘(‘,1}, {atom,1,t}, {‘)‘,1}, {dot,1}], 1} 4> {ok, ETs, _} = erl_scan:string("-export([say/0])."). {ok,[{‘-‘,1}, {atom,1,export}, {‘(‘,1}, {‘[‘,1}, {atom,1,say}, {‘/‘,1}, {integer,1,0}, {‘]‘,1}, {‘)‘,1}, {dot,1}], 1} 5> {ok, FTs, _} = erl_scan:string("say() -> \"hello_world!!\"."). {ok,[{atom,1,say}, {‘(‘,1}, {‘)‘,1}, {‘->‘,1}, {string,1,"hello_world!!"}, {dot,1}], 1} 6> Forms= [begin {ok,R}=erl_parse:parse_form(Item),R end || Item<-[MTs,ETs,FTs]]. [{attribute,1,module,t}, {attribute,1,export,[{say,0}]}, {function,1,say,0, [{clause,1,[],[],[{string,1,"hello_world!!"}]}]}] 7> {ok, t, Bin} = compile:forms(Forms). {ok,t, <<70,79,82,49,0,0,1,224,66,69,65,77,65,116,111,109,0,0,0, 45,0,0,0,5,1,116,...>>} 8> code:load_binary(t,"nofile",Bin). {module,t} 9> t:say(). "hello_world!!" 10>
好吧,好多好玩的东西还没有说,暂时到这里,下回继续......
最后小图一张,经历了25年,13季,大侦探波洛的故事结束了,"女士们,先生们,该收场了........."