注明：原文来自 Mike Cohn的邮件推送,我已将原文贴在最后供参考，翻译的目的是为了锻炼自己的能力和理解水平，如有版权侵犯，请告之。
The sprint review is perhaps the most renamed meeting in Scrum. Sure, the daily Scrum is often referred to as the Daily Standup.
But I‘ve heard more than one additional name give to the Review.
I‘ve heard it called the Showcase. I‘ve heard it renamed the Dog & Pony Show. I‘ve even heard it called the Christians and the Lions meeting, which I suppose described how the team felt when in the meeting.
And, of course, I‘ve heard it referred to as the Sprint Demo.
What‘s wrong with all these nicknames for the Sprint Review?
They all undermine the true purpose of the meeting. The purpose of the Sprint Review is for the team to receive feedback from their stakeholders.
Agile is based on the ability to inspect and adapt. The Review provides an opportunity for stakeholders (and, in some cases, the product owner) to inspect the work of the team. Collaboratively then, all participants discuss how to adapt.
If stakeholders like what they see, do more of it. If they don‘t, consider whether what‘s been done is good enough, whether it should be tossed aside, and either redone or bypassed in favor of other features.
All participants should leave a sprint review more knowledgeable than when they arrived. And the product owner should leave with updates to be made to the product backlog that will result in a better product.
Remembering that the purpose of the sprint review is to gather feedback will help you succeed with agile.
Spring检视会可能是Scrum里面被重命名最多的一个会，当然，每日Scrum也经常被命名为每日站会。
但我已经不止一次听到它被命名为检视。
我听到有称呼为展示会的，也听到有称为小狗小马秀，我甚至听说过这个叫基督徒和狮子会的会议，我认为这个会议描述了团队在会议中的感受。
当然，我听说它被称为Sprint演示.
所有这些Sprint Review Meeting 的昵称有什么问题吗？
这些都破坏了这个会议的真正目的。 Sprint Review 会议的真正目的是让团队从项目干系人那里收集反馈。
敏捷是基于检查和适应的能力，Review会议为项目干系人(有时是产品经理)提供了一个机会给他们检查团队的工作，所有参与者协同合作，讨论如何适应。
如果干系人喜欢他们的产出，就继续做多点。反之，则思考一下我们做得是否足够好，是否应该抛在一边，并重新或绕过去做有利于其他的功能。
所有参与者应该让冲刺评估比到达时更丰富，更有知识。 产品所有者应该随时更新产品积压，从而产生更好的产品。
记住冲刺检查的目的是收集反馈，帮助您成功实现敏捷。